THE BAPTISM OF JESUS
Essay
December, 1974
When Jesus was about thirty years old, there came
a man called John into the nearby wilder ness
preaching the coming end of the world
and calling upon men to forgo their "wickedness"
and to deal justly and ethically with each other.
He became known as John the Baptizer because of his
ritual of cleansing people in the river; and he is
reported to have said that there was another great-
er than himself coming after him, who would baptize
them with fire as he was baptizing them with water.
It seems clear from his carefully reported words in
both Luke and Matthew that his message was one of a'
coming judgment by fire.
Apparently Jesus first accepted these teachings of John
for he came himself to be baptized. We are told that
at the moment of his baptism the heavens were opened to him
and he saw a dove descending upon him, and heard a voice
saying to him in the words of the Old Testament Psalm:
"Thou art my beloved son; this day have I begotten thee"
(Ps. 2: 7; quoted this way also in Heb. 1: 5). There is
no reason to think that this vision was seen by anyone else
at that time; both Mark and Luke report the experience
and the words as being to Jesus alone, although Matthew
changes the words of the Psalmist to make it seem
that the words were spoken to all those gathered there
("This is my beloved son..."). But we know that
historicallY John continued with his own disciples
until his death, and if John had acknowledged Jesus
as the One coming after him, as Matthew tells it, and if
those words had been spoken to all of John's followers
it does not seem likely that John would have continued
with his own followers nor that he would have questioned Jesus
as he did later ("Art thou he that should come?" Matt. 11:3;
Luke 7:19).
It is then reported that Jesus withdrew into the wilderness
for forty days and forty nights, or for an extended period
during which he was "tempted of Satan". Luke and Matthew
provide details for these temptations, reporting them as
three in number, all involving supernatural activity
and all rejected by Jesus in words chosen from the
Old Testament. The first of these three temptations as
reported was to turn stones into bread, which Jesus rejects
by replying, "Man does : not live by bread alone." (Deut. 8:3)
The second was to cast hlmself down from the plnnacle of the
temple to prove that the angels would catch him, which Jesus
rejects by answering, "Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God"
(Deut. 6:16). And the third was to bow down and worship Satan
in exchange for kingship over all the kingdoms of the world
to which Jesus replies, "Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God
and him only shalt thou serve." (Deut. 6:13) These are
reported as happening to Jesus alone, which means that he
must have told them to his followers in order for them
to have been written down, which in turn means that he
probably had a reason for telling them.
What is the significance of the baptism and the
temptations? There seems no reason to doubt that Jesus
underwent some great experience at the time of his baptism;
it must be understood to have been an inner event
rather than an outer event because of the lack of evidence
that anyone else present heard or saw anything. The meaning
of the event for Jesus can perhaps best be understood
from his own words: "Thou art my beloved son; this day
have I begotten thee." This choice of expression from
the Psalms tells us two things: that Jesus experienced
possibly for the first time, the meaning of sonship with God
and that at least some aspect of that sonship seemed new
as of that day. Whether this had anything to do
with the teaching of John concerning the end of the world
cannot be assumed.
Jesus probably withdrew into the wilderness to ponder
on whatever this new insight was that he had during
the baptism, and also further on the teaching of John
which had brought him to be baptized. Mark tells us
that Jesus was "driven" by the Spirit into the wilderness
and was with the wild beasts. Since it may well be
doubted that the temptations describe any actual outer event
they must also be understood to be inner events. But in
order to have any relevance to us or to the Jews of
Jesus' day, they must be applicable to some current
experience of theirs and ours; else they are hollow
statements showing at best Jesus' own special purity
but even then they suggest that his listeners
and we ourselves should respond in like fashion to
similar temptations. It is an historical fact that
at that time there were three different messianic
hopes held by the Jews: the hope that God would
himself come and rule over the kingdom of Israel;
the hope for a religious Messiah who would come
with signs and wonders and re-establish Israel as
an independent kingdomr and the hope for a political Messiah
who would overthrow the Romans and establish the Jews
as the rulers of the world. Jesus' responses to these
temptations can be seen as symbolic answers to each
of these three hopes: it was devilish, or Satanic
to hope that God would intervene in history, even to
assist the Jews who for hundreds of years
had considered themselves as the "Chosen People";
God would not intervene in history for any reason whatever
and any action based on that hope was misled; and finally
any action based on the hope of any man or any nation
for rulership over the world had nothing to do with the
kingdom of God and was in fact a temptation of the devil. Thus
the three temptations can be understood as parables
in which Jesus speaks to each of the Messianic hopes
held by his people, in which he not only rejects those hopes
but asserts positively that they are temptations of the devil
that they are Satanic in origin, and thereby makes his answers
apply not only to himself but to all persons.
(originally published under the name of John Fitz)