GOD IS A MYTH
Essay
November, 1977
God is a myth. Let's face the truth: all pictures
of a being, spirit, or force pervading the universe
and directing all life, whether anthropomorphic or not
are just as mythical as the many gods and goddesses
of ancient Greece and Rome. The fact that many persons
including myself, have had "mystical experiences
of the infinite or of the Light or anything else
does not impart one shred of credibility to any
of these images.
Let's start with Jehovah. Who believes in
a "Lord God" who treated one small group as
his Chosen People, and commanded them to kill
thousands of other men and women and conquer
their lands? Jehovah revealed his feet of clay
and mythical nature when Assyria overran North Israel
and Babylon conquered Judah; even the restoration
under Cyrus the Persian, who was hailed as Jehovah's
Messiah, only lasted a few decades and soon the Jews
were under more complete domination than ever.
Let's take God the Father as pictured by the Catholic
Church and Christianity. This picture is actually a
polytheistic one since it contains a God, a Son of God
some mysterious third entity called the "Holy Ghost"
and (although not yet deified) the Mother of God, who
was taken up bodily into heaven in 1953 by the Pope;
and then there is also the ever-increasing pantheon
of saints. This myth claims that Jesus, the only Son
of God, was condemned to a cruel death by a God-Father
who would only accept that death in order to pardon
humankind. What human father would demand such a thing?
What a preposterous lie to teach that humans were so
depraved that only the death of a perfect being --
God's own son -- could save them! What a further lie
to teach that the only way to regain God's love was
tq believe that Jesus was the only Son of God! The
Christian myth falls under its own weight; who can show
me that this benighted story is morally superior or
even equal to any ancient myth? While the prophetic
teachings of the Old Testament depict one God who
is the Father of all humankind, Christianity has
been responsible for some of the greatest horrors in
history in the name of that God.
Finally, let's take the view that "God" is a spirit
of some kind, or a force or law of being or behavior
trying to stay as far away as we can from any
anthropomorphic projections about "will" or "thought"
or "intention" or "desire" in such a force or law. It
may indeed be true that there are "moral laws" governing
behavior, and the word "God" could indeed be used to
refer to such laws, but it is hard to discern them. It
may indeed be that "love conquers all" or that "What
you sow, that you will reap" but there are hundreds
thousands, millions of exceptions to these laws; many of
those who practiced love and non-violence suffered and
died for that practice, and people often reap both good
and ill regardless of what they sow. (This is not to
argue against such behavior, merely to assert that the
desirability of such behavior proves nothing about the
existence of moral law.) And even if such laws were
absolute, and could be counted on in the ways that laws
of physics can be counted on, the word "God" would be
inappropriate because it inescapably connotes
anthropomorphic properties; if we mean "moral law"
we should say moral law, and if we mean "karmic
law" we should say karmic law. But to pretend
that a "God" exists because of observations
regarding "karmic law" which appear to be generally true
is to invest that supposed law with some measure of
personality and humanness, of will and intention, of
control of events.
Let's talk now about "mystical experiences". There can
be no doubt that many people have had unusual experiences
called "experiences of God", often described as a vision
or a voice or intense light. But we also have dreams
and often our dreams seem real; how can anyone distinguish
between a purported "experience of God" and a dream or a
hallucination? The fact that one may feel "high" or elated
or even fulfilled is no basis for distinguishing one
from another. So mystical experiences can not, can never
prove the-existence of anything other than mystical
experiences, no matter how much "oneness" or "light" is
experienced.
(originally published under the name of John Fitz)