THE STORY OF YESHUA
by miriam berg
Chapter XXIV
JERUSALEM III
Yeshua and his disciples spent that night back in Bethany,
and returned into Jerusalem the next morning. It was on
this day Yeshua finally got down to specifics about the
harms he blames the Pharisees for causing; and he included the
Sadducees and the chief priests in his bill of particulars. He
began fairly gently:
Beware of the scribes, who like to walk in long
robes, and to be saluted to in the marketplaces,
and to sit in chief seats in the synagogues, and
in the chief places at feasts; but they are those
who devour widows' houses, consuming all their
inheritance, and for pretence they utter long and
loud prayers; this is pure unrighteousness.
He has commented on the chasing after chief seats three times
now; it must have been an obtrusive habit of his opponents. The
rest of this discourse comes mostly from Matthew, who probably
collected everything he could find that Yeshua had said
condemning the Pharisees and scribes. But it itemizes what it was that
he objected to in their practices, and presumably what he wanted
them to quit doing, and try to attain the reign of God instead.
Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees! for you
pretend to have the key of knowledge, and claim
to be the ones to open and shut the door of the
kingdom of God; but you have not entered in
yourselves, and those that are seeking to enter,
you hinder them.
Remember previously when he inveighed against those who try to
prevent someone from entering the reign of God? Now he says
that it is the Pharisees themselves who are causing this
hindrance. By what means? By claiming to have the knowledge
of the kingdom, and by passing judgment over who is in the
reign of God and who is not. Worse, they are acting like
sentinels and guards, without being in the reign themselves.
He does not tell them why they are not in the reign, but based
on his earlier teachings, we can assume it was their failure
to practice universal love and love of enemies.
Woe unto you, you scribes and Pharisees,
you hypocrites! for you scour land and sea to
make one convert, and when you find one, you
make them even more of a prude and a snob
about religion than yourselves!
There does not seem to be so much that is unrighteous
about this kind of behavior, however obnoxious it may be.
He goes on:
Woe unto you, you blind guides, who say,
If a man swears by the temple, it does not
count; but if he swears by the gold which
is in the temple, he is bound by that oath.
You fools who are blind, which is greater,
the gold, or the temple that sanctifies the
gold?
Or again: If a man swears by the altar
in the temple, it does not count; but if he
swears by the gift that lies upon the altar,
he is bound. That is stupid; for which is
greater, the gift, or the altar that makes
the gift special?
So you should say that if a person swears
by the altar, he swears by all the things
that are upon it as well; and if he swears
by the temple, he also swears by all the
things that are in it. And if you swear by
the heaven, you are swearing even by the
throne of God.
On the plain of Gennesaret he spoke unequivocally against
oaths: Swear not at all. But here he is simply pointing out
a moral inconsistency and superficiality of their teachings
about oaths, which allowed subtle knaves to get out of their
oaths, and the simple, or the poor and unlearned, to be held
to their unwitting pledges even if it bankrupted them. And
of course the money lost by the poor went into the purses of
those that were rich. But he continues again:
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for you tithe of mint and anise
and cummin, and all manner of sweet-smelling
herbs, for the pleasing effect they create;
but you have left undone the weightier things
of the law: justice and mercy and faith in God.
But these you ought to have done, without
having to leave the other undone. You blind
guides, who strain at gnats, and swallow the
camel, which even a donkey knows not to do.
So one of the things he holds against the Pharisees' actions
is their ostentation and show of piety, when they are not
paying attention to justice (those who are not with the
haberim are kept humiliated and subservient) and mercy (the
tiny rules of the Torah are made more burdensome for those
who can least carry them out) and love of God with all your
strength, heart, and soul. He does not say that they should
not go through the formal motions of gifts and incense,
merely that there are more important things to think about.
They are paying too much attention to infinitesimal things
and too little to infinite things. Then he says more yet:
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for you wash the outside
of your cups and pots, but within they
are grimy with all your extortion and
excess. You blind ones, first you should
wash the inside of your utensils, and
then it matters, and the outside may be
washed as well.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for you are like sepulchres,
painted white on the outside, but inwardly
are full of dead men's bones, and decay
and putrefaction. You are like that; you
put forth great shows of righteousness
before men, but inwardly you are full of
hypocrisy and harmfulness.
Again he hammers at their love of outward show of virtue, at
the expense of deterioration of their caring and forgiveness,
their inward love. He tells them they should first polish up
their inner character which creates their outward actions;
it does not matter how glossy the surface is if their deeds
are not in accordance with the ways of righteousness, which
he did not need to tell them about, they could read about
them in the Torah. He is not finished yet:
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for you build monuments to
the prophets, and decorate with wreaths
the tombs of the righteous, and boast,
If we had been in the days of our fathers,
we would not have joined in their acts of
despising and rejecting them.
But you are still the sons of them
that killed the prophets; and you are
no better than your fathers, unless you
can strive to prevent the coming days
of disaster from making this place like Gehinnom!
Matthew quotes Yeshua as calling them "serpents" and "brood
of vipers"; but these expressions almost certainly came
later when the enmity between the Jews and the followers of
Yeshua had become bitter and genocidal. Finally he says:
And it is written that God has said,
I will send unto them prophets, and wise men,
and scribes; and some of them they will kill
and persecute; and the blood of all the
prophets, which was shed from the beginning
of the world, shall be upon all succeeding
generations; from the blood of Abel unto the
blood of Zachariah, whom your fathers killed
between the holy of holies and the altar;
I say that it shall soon happen to this
generation.
Matthew mistakenly calls the father of Zachariah by the name
of Berechiah; the story happened in the days of Joash the
grandson of Jezebel who killed Zachariah the son of Jehoiada
the high priest who had saved him from destruction by Athaliah,
Jezebel's daughter. But here his emphasis is upon the fact
that the prophets were mistreated, even though they were
acknowledged to be emissaries of God. And the punishment would
fall upon this generation the more because they had failed to
follow the "weightier matters of the law" as given in the prophets;
not, we might notice, out of God's vengeance, but because of
their own failure to practice their own historical teachings.
This completes the catalogue of criticism levelled by Yeshua
against the scribes and Pharisees. Now, it is clear that
he has spent his year or so of traveling and teaching
breaking the laws of the haberim, despising or ignoring their
punctilious observances. What is not so clear, after all, is
what was immoral or evil about those observances. He has put
xhem down, saying that you did not need to do them at all; but
that does not make them evil, it only makes them unnecessary.
We need to remember that the Pharisees were in many ways a
saving force in the history of the Jews. By their insistence
on the observance of the historical traditions they prevented
the assimilation of the Jews into the Hellenistic and Roman culture,
whereas the deported citizens of Israel had been assimilated into
Assyrian society and disappeared. But for the Judeans who were
defeated and deported by the Babylonians the story was different;
they have survived as a people, but the Babylonians have disappeared
completely. And the best among the Pharisees taught and practiced
ethical and moral teachings many of which resemble those which
Yeshua promulgated: Rabbi Hillel, as we have told, and Shammai too,
and others. We should expect this, of course, since they were both
reading the same Hebrew scriptures.
But the practice of their own teachings had always been held
back by the "chosen people" notion, which was a narrow
nationalism and sense of superiority to the peoples around
them. Ezra, the scribe who returned from Babylon in about the
fourth century B.C.E., insisted on everyone who was married to a
non-Jew getting divorced from them and expelling them from the
Jewish society. The book of Ruth, which taught that David's own
grandmother had been a foreigner, a Moabitess, and a wicked
foreigner according to the Jewish notions at that, and the book
of Jonah, which taught that God could forgive even the most
wicked of men, symbolized by the Assyrians who destroyed Israel,
were written about this time or later, to protest such narrow
exclusiveness. And by the time of Yeshua this narrowness had
degenerated into primarily a practice of being rigidly different
for the sake of being different; and it appears where Yeshua
most rejected the teachings of his fellow-Jews was in his
attitude towards non-Jews. He preaches to and heals all alike:
a Roman, a Phoenician, a Samaritan; and he pictures a non-Jew,
the Samaritan, as the world's most unforgettable example of
compassion and caring. We can even conclude that it was not his
breaking of the rules of the scribes and Pharisees that set them
so much against him as it was his acceptance of and caring for
non-Jews.
While they were still inside the temple courtyard, he went
over to the contribution jars which were embedded in the
wall to see how much money visitors were putting in. As he
stood there, he watched many well-to-do persons tossing in many
coins and valuable gifts. Then there came a poor widow, who
put in a tiny coin, called by Mark "two mites, which make a
farthing." It must have been almost the smallest possible coin
in Hebrewdom. But Yeshua called his disciples over, and said:
Look at this, I tell you: this poor woman has
contributed more than anyone else who has given;
for they gave but a little out of their great
wealth; but she cast in every penny she had.
Again he criticizes the hoarding of wealth, and says it is better
give much of what little you have than to have much and give little.
Next chapter